The old alchemists of the early Renaissance sought the secret philosopher's stone, which would, in the right recipe, transform lead into gold. You can only transform gold into lead. This book is written to show you how to do that. The gold is nothing other than the child's imagination, which if it is not gold itself, can still work the miracle of old King Midas. "Nature only provides us with a leaden world," wrote the poet Philip Sidney, "but it is the poet that makes for us a golden one." If we can deaden the imagination, then, we can settle the child down, and make of him that solid, dependable, and inert space-filler in school and, later, a block of the great state pyramid.Underlying Esolen's thesis is his belief that it is God himself who made us to imagine and that it is at least partly through our imaginations and longings that we seek him and experience all that he intended for us.
Some readers who love language and literature less than I do, will find his constant use of literature, and in particular the classics, distracting and maybe even a little pretentious. But this is his passion and interest and language and literature are major foundations for imagination and creativity. Even as one not educated at school with Homer, Aristotle, Dickens, Chaucer, the poetry of Philip Sidney and the music of Bach, I was swept along by his use of the great texts. Esolen uses a wonderful cross section of literature, music and even art to make his simple points about the nature of imagination, its ultimate purpose, and the dangers of shutting it down in our children. The writing is ironic in style as the title suggests. At times this seems a little forced but overall, for me, it works powerfully.
In my view, as an educator, his 10 'Methods' that will destroy the imagination of children, do bring into focus that which can stifle learning and close down the possibilities for the imaginings of children. As we do this, we also reduce their ability to solve problems, write with voice and effectiveness, and be transformed (or at least shaped) by the language and power of literature.
Esolen's 10 Methods to destroy the imagination
1. Begin by rearing children almost exclusively indoors - give in to the threats of the outdoors, don't risk allowing them to have unbridled experiences out of our observable space. Lock them up in classes and organised instruction and avoid giving them opportunities to run free.
2. Never allow children to organise their own worlds of exploration of that which is interesting or challenging - replace the spontaneous and child initiated and replace it with 7 days of structured activities controlled by others and a timetable that leaves no scope for exploration, time wasting and contemplation.
3. Don't risk allowing children to explore machines or encounter those who know and use them - privilege safety above all things, cut craftsmen from the child's world, despise practical and craft knowledge, forget about the challenge and fascination of maps, diagrams and the like.
4. Replace fairy tales with cliches and fads - water down stories to remove the evil and violent, look for tales that 'flatten' and homogenise, replace fundamental truths with cliches and ideological manifestos.
Odysseus |
6. Cut down all heroes to size - don't allow a sentimental admiration of a hero, dismiss courage, beat from our boys any hint of hero worship. Instead grow men 'without chests' who spend hours on violent video games but never rumble in the back yard.
7. Reduce all talk of love to narcissism and sex - replace the music and tenderness of love in the Odyssey, or the poetry of Stephen Foster for a lost love, with a reduction of love to the mechanics of sex, "reduce eros to the itch of lust or vanity". Replace the first pangs of curiosity of a boy for a girl, or a girl for a boy, with a bombardment of images of what love isn't.
8. Level all distinctions between man and woman - just as individual personalities are washed from our classrooms, so too, reduce all differences of gender, and convince children that boys and girls are just the same.
9. Distract the child with the shallow or unreal - fail to encourage the child to hear and sharpen the senses before creating, abolish solitude and silence, fill the child's life with the 'noise' of television, video games and other forms of banality. Don't just give decibels of noise but rather, more importantly, mental and spiritual interference. Separate the child from the relationship of family, neighbours and friends and place them in after school care, preschools etc.
10. Deny the transcendent - deny the idea of God, ignore the mystery of faith and religion, ensure that unlike the ancients in the caves of Lascaux there is little opportunity to contemplate and create a veritable cathedral born of their imaginings. Do everything possible to erase any opportunity for your child to search out the inscriptions of praise on each human heart.
Summing Up
Esolen has put his finger on something important. He isn't the first person to write about imagination and as he suggests himself, he's probably not the best-qualified person to do so either. But his book reminds us that imagination is not just a cognitive state to be prodded and used for the banal or even the practical. In fact, it has moral dimensions that can be seen in a biblical anthropology of personhood. A view of the person that sees the ability and desire to imagine as part of God's blueprint for his people.
Esolen also offers a useful social commentary on the tendency to seek the banal rather than that, which is rich and complex. His ironic commentary on approaches to teaching and child rearing that value the tangible and measurable, rather than the whimsical and creative is helpful, although in places a touch too simplistic. One example of this is that in dismissing technology and in rightly pointing to the abuses of gaming and television and their ability to distract from friends, play, exploration etc, he fails to acknowledge that technology can expand the imagination too. Technology can open up a world of new facts that trigger exploration, or offering opportunities to create images, videos and complex texts that expand the imagination.
Some won't like Esolen's ironic style, for there is a danger in its over-use. At times it tends to give the sense that Esolen is trivialising the issues and ignoring complexity and ambiguity. This might lead some not take Esolen's arguments seriously. This would be a pity for there is much wise advice in this book.
Esolen offers a timely and beautifully written analysis of pop-culture and a world where we 'flatten' the view of what it means to be men and women, we lose a vital focus on moral centring and values, we accept an impoverished view of childhood, and we replace love for lust, the thirst for the deep with the shallow and flood children's lives with banality instead of richness. This book will have non-Christian detractors, but it will also stimulate discussions concerning the loss of childhood and the place of the imagination not just in life but also in grasping something of the transcendental and an existence beyond this life. As Esolen reminds us:
The imagination opens out not principally to what it knows and finds familiar, but to what it does not know, what it finds strange, half hidden, robed with inaccessible light. The familiar too can be an object of wonder, but not by its familiarity...
Some Other Practical Posts for Parents and Teachers Interested in the Imagination
1. 'The Importance of Simple Play' (HERE)
2. 'The Role of Adults in Children's Play' (HERE)
3. 'The Dangerous Book for Boys' (HERE)
4. 'Understanding and Developing Creativity' (HERE)
2 comments:
Hi Trevor,
Thanks for this post. Being a parent of young children (or young-ish – how quickly they grow up!), this is a subject close to my heart. Most of Esolen’s suggestions seem excellent, and I am keen to read the book. A few observations in the meantime.
Point 2: While agreeing that excessive structure can have a stifling effect on the growing imagination of a child, structure in and of itself is not a bad thing, and can lead to pathways of imagination being explored which would be missed if the child’s time is not usefully employed (sitting around the house doing nothing for hours on end is usually not beneficial in itself: time is one of God’s gifts which (like all the others) can be used usefully, or not).
Point 8: While I certainly agree in principle that we should not teach our children that boys and girls are “just the same”, I’m not clear as to how this might have a deleterious effect on the development of the imagination (no doubt the book attempts to make this clear).
Point 9: I think with the mention of the “noise” and banality of TV, video games, etc, and the harmful effect they can have on the development of the imagination, he approaches the heart of the matter. My observation of my own children, and those of others, leads me to think that the modern world, with its apparent obsession with electronic media, has a lot to answer for. Trevor, you rightly suggest that technology “can expand the imagination”. Regrettably, it seems that in practice, the opposite is very often the case (we see many examples of this). There seems to be a challenge here for parents to proactively ensure that their children are not allowed unbridled freedom in this area, but rather are required to use such technology wisely and well.
Regards,
Greg
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your comment. I'm sorry it's taken so long to acknowledge it. I agree that structure can be very important for children but Esolen's point is a much more basic one. He is suggesting that modern life is characterised by one planned activity after another for many children. In school they face structure, after school they have timetables, weekends are taken up with planned sport, language schools, ballet etc etc. His point is that we need to give children space and time to explore interests on their terms.
His point 8 is perhaps the most poorly argued but in simple terms he is speaking against the tendency to treat boys and girls they same, to tell girls they can do anything a boy does and the failure to see that manhood and womanhood are different. He sees this as closing off opportunities.
I'm not quite as hard on technology as you are. Yes, misuse of technology and excessive use of gaming with doubtful content won't do much that is positive but technology has great potential to expand children's worlds.
Thanks again,
Trevor
Post a Comment